Method
How the work is done. Not the theory of it — the practice.
Method at MIRAK is not a philosophy. It is a set of operational commitments: how claims are constructed, how evidence is classified, how arguments are tested before they are published. The work proceeds through these constraints, not despite them.
The starting point is always the distinction between what is known, what is inferred, and what is speculated. These are not stylistic choices. They are structural requirements. A piece that blurs this distinction has already failed before the reader encounters it.
The operative rules.
Evidence Tiers
Every claim carries a classification: primary source, secondary inference, or analytical speculation. These are never mixed in the same sentence without clear marking.
Structural Integrity
An argument must hold at the level of individual sentences, at the level of paragraphs, and at the level of the whole. Coherence at one scale does not guarantee it at another.
Revision as Analysis
Editing is not cosmetic. It is the stage at which the thinking is actually completed. First drafts are structural proposals. Final work is the result of pressure applied to those proposals.